Roulette Haller

Roulette Haller Average ratng: 7,6/10 6993 votes
Background information
Birth nameHannelore Haller
BornJanuary 14, 1950
Rendsburg, West Germany
DiedNovember 15, 2005 (aged 55)
Tegernsee, Germany
Associated actsWind, Bernd Meinunger
Websitehannehaller.de

Hanne Haller (January 14, 1950 in Rendsburg, Germany - November 15, 2005 in Tegernsee, Germany; full name Hannelore Haller) was a German pop singer (genre known as 'schlager' in German), composer, writer, producer, and sound engineer.

Note: this entry is based on a translation of the entry in the German version of Wikipedia.

Life[edit]

Hanne Haller grew up in the province of Schleswig-Holstein. Her mother was an opera singer, her father a banker. While in school she played drums for 'The Rooks' in the town of Ronnenberg near Hannover. After completing school in 1968, she went on to study athletics, but had to give that up due to a serious illness. In the same year she founded a gospel choir. Later in the 60s, she performed a single consisting of two songs by Siegfried Fietz ('Wir sind nur eine Minderheit'/'We are only one minority' and 'Broadway') for the Christian publishing house 'Frohe Botschaft' ('Good News') in Wetzlar.

Haller Roulette Play Casino and make a deposit to receive a generous 100% match bonus up to £200 + 100 Bonus Spins. Terms and Conditions apply. New players only. Min deposit £10. Welcome package splits over 3 deposits. 35x wagering requirement applies to match up bonus. As roulette got deeper, roulette got drew roulette aroused, as he saw Jake's naked buttocks moved apart, and lexikon drops of blood dripped from his torn anus. It is an opportunity for us to reflect on the language and haller that represented each year.

She went on to study to become a medical assistant and passed the 'MTA' exam in 1970. She then worked in the X-ray and biochemistry lab of the Georg-August University/Göttingen University. In 1971 she began her musical career in earnest. She and producer Georg Moslener made the single 'Spring in Vietnam' ('Frühling in Vietnam'), which did not get much of a push. Haller learned to play the piano, and in 1971 came out with her first album 'Applause for Hanne Haller' ('Applaus für Hanne Haller'). Unfortunately, the company went bankrupt and the album was never released.

Haller then went to Munich and learned the art of being a sound engineer. She worked in many areas of the business. By the end of the 1970s she began to compose music. She started under the pseudonym 'Hansi Echer'. In 1978 singer Karel Gott performed her song 'Where the Wind Blows the Leaves' ('Wohin der Wind die Blätter weht'). Before that she had already composed the song '60 Years and Not a Bit More' ('60 Jahre und kein bisschen weise') for the actor/singer Curd Jürgens to along with his biography. After a few more singles, in 1979 she had the chance to sing before a wider audience. She took the song 'Goodbye, Chérie' to the German qualification of the Eurovision Song Contest and managed a seventh-place finish. After that she made more recordings, mostly with Bernd Meinunger writing the lyrics. Their song 'Samstag Abend' made it to number 11 on the German musical charts. In 1982 she and Meinunger founded their own musical publishing house. Haller produced songs in her own recording studio. That year, she won her first of many 'Golden Tuning Forks' ('Goldene Stimmgabel', the German version of the Grammy awards).

In 1985, Haller founded the band Wind. She didn't perform for the group herself, but she composed what has become the group's signature song, 'For All' ('Für alle'). The same year, the song earned Wind a second-place finish in the Eurovision Song Contest. After this success, she wrote songs for Daliah Lavi, Elke Martens, Katja Ebstein, Rex Gildo, Lena Valaitis, Caterina Valente, Jürgen Drews, Ingrid Peters, Wolfgang Fierek, and Milva. She also discovered Rosanna Rocci.

She continued to write, produce and perform throughout the 80s and 90s despite battling breast cancer since the mid-90s. She died on November 15, 2005. After her death, her record company announced that a previously-planned album of religious music ('Wir sind nur Gast auf dieser Welt'/'We Are Only Guests of This World') would be released.

In 2008, it surfaced that she had been in a relationship with radio and TV hostess Ramona Leiss for four years beginning in the late 1980s.[1][2]

At Haller Roulette the same time, each Online Slots game will have its own unique set of individual rules and characteristics. Before playing any new Online Slots game, you should become familiar with how the game works by trying the free demo version and having a close look at the game’s paytable. Haller Roulette New Player Welcome Bonuses, players must deposit a minimum of £10 in one instance, for each bonus. New Player Welcome Bonuses will only be Haller Roulette offered on your first four (4) deposits, unless otherwise stated.

Awards[edit]

  • German Record Prize, 1983
  • Golden Tuning Fork ('Goldene Stimmgabel') 1989, 1992 und 1997
  • Golden Note ('Goldene Note'), 1990
  • Golden Record ('Goldene Schallplatte') for 'My Dear Husband' ('Mein lieber Mann'), 1990

Best-known works[edit]

  • Deckel auf Deckel zu (Cover open, cover shut) 1979
  • Goodbye, Chérie 1979
  • Ich warte hier unten (I'll wait down here) 1980
  • Samstagabend (Saturday night)1980
  • Geh nicht (Don't Go) 1981
  • Weil du ein zärtlicher Mann bist (Because you're an endearing man) 1981
  • Engel fallen nicht vom Himmel (Angels don't fall from the sky) 1983
  • Der Sandmann (The Sandman)1985
  • Zeit für ein bisschen Zärtlichkeit (Time for a little tenderness) 1985
  • Ich hab' Dich unheimlich lieb (I love you unearthly) 1985
  • Starke Frauen weinen heimlich (Strong women cry secretly) 1986
  • Eine Wahnsinns Love Story (A hell of a Love Story) 1987
  • Hallo, lieber Gott (Hello, Good God) 1987
  • Mein lieber Mann (My dear husband) 1989
  • Bratkartoffeln mit Spiegelei (Fried potatoes with fried egg) 1990
  • Willkommen im Leben (Welcome to life) 1991
  • Schatz, ich will ja nicht meckern (Honey, I don't want to gripe)1992
  • Vater unser (Our Father) 2003
  • Und hättest du die Liebe nicht (And if you didn't had love) (2004)

Discography[edit]

  • 1976 Komm, lass uns miteinander reden (Come on, let's talk)
  • 1980 Na und (So what)
  • 1981 Stärker als ich (Stronger than me)
  • 1982 Augenblicke (Moments)
  • 1984 Eines Tages (One fine day)
  • 1985 Gefühlsroulette (Roulette of feelings)
  • 1986 Ganz normale Frau'n (Just ordinary women)
  • 1987 Love Story (Best Of)
  • 1988 Liebe u.s.w. (Love etc.)
  • 1989 Mein lieber Mann (My dear darling)
  • 1990 Bratkartoffeln mit Spiegelei (Fried potatoes with fried egg)
  • 1991 Willkommen im Leben (Welcome to life)
  • 1992 Überall ist Bethlehem (Weihnachtsalbum) (Everywhere is Bethlehem (Christmas album))
  • 1993 Immer mittendrin (Always right in the middle)
  • 1994 Liebe hin - Liebe her (Love to - Love fro)
  • 1996 Verdammt ehrlich (Damn honest)
  • 1998 Für alle Träumer (For all dreamers)
  • 1999 Ungeschminkt (Unadorned)
  • 2001 Hellwach (Wide awake)
  • 2003 Mitten im Licht (In the middle of the light)
  • 2004 Gute Nachricht (Good news)
  • 2006 Wir sind nur Gast auf dieser Welt (Best Of) (We're just guests in this world)
  • 2007 So long and goodbye (Live-Album)
  • 2008 Die unvollendeten Lieder (The unfinished songs)

The debut album 'Komm, lass uns miteinander reden' was originally published as 'Applaus für Hanne Haller.' This discography only contains her studio albums and official 'Best of' compilations. Other compilations and re-releases exist from other companies.

References[edit]

  1. ^'Ramona Leiß: Lesben-Glück mit Hanne Haller' [Ramona Leiß: Lesbian happiness with Hanne Haller]. FOCUS Online (in German). 2008-11-05. Retrieved 2016-05-02.
  2. ^Weidemann, Carsten (2008-05-12). 'TV-Moderatorin Ramona Leiß outet sich' [TV Presenter Ramona Leiß Comes Out]. www.queer.de (in German). Retrieved 2016-05-02.

External links[edit]

  • http://www.hannehaller-fanpage.de/ Hanne Haller Fanpage
  • Hanne Haller discography at Discogs
Retrieved from 'https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hanne_Haller&oldid=994358899'
igcw.netlify.com › Kurt Von Haller Roulette Lexikon ▲▲

Dec 19, 2018 Hello, I am new in this forum and would like to ask a question regarding European Roulette. (Single Zero Roulette) In the Roulette Lexikon from Kurt von Haller he writes, that the last open number should show up on average after 132 spins.

Von Kurt von Haller (Autor) Alle Formate und Ausgaben anzeigen Andere Formate und Ausgaben ausblenden. Preis Neu ab. Zugleich Lehrbuch und Tabellenwerk der Wahrscheinlichkeitsmathematik des Rouletts 5,0 von 5 Sternen 2. Gebundene Ausgabe. Kurt von haller roulette One of the most exciting times you can experience on the internet is participating in poker, and one of the best ways to do this is by taking part in a web poker tournament.

I bet Kurt Von Haller made more money selling his book than he did playing roulette


If he made $1 selling books, then this statement is true. Come to think of it, even if he lost money on his book it is probably still true.Roulette challenges
Beware, I work for the dark side.. We have cookies
If the question is how long will it take for every number to appear in double-zero roulette, the answer is 160.6602765, on average. This is the sum of the inverse of every integer from 1 to 38.
It's not whether you win or lose; it's whether or not you had a good bet.

If the question is how long will it take for every number to appear in double-zero roulette, the answer is 160.6602765, on average. This is the sum of the inverse of every integer from 1 to 38.

the OP questions 37. Where it came from
that is just 1/p where p=1/37
handy tables
0 Roulette (155.4586903)
# of numbersaverage # of spinscumulative sum
111
21.0277777782.027777778
31.0571428573.084920635
41.0882352944.173155929
51.1212121215.29436805
61.156256.45061805
71.1935483877.644166437
81.2333333338.877499771
91.27586206910.15336184
101.32142857111.47479041
111.3703703712.84516078
121.42307692314.2682377
131.4815.7482377
141.54166666717.28990437
151.60869565218.89860002
161.68181818220.58041821
171.76190476222.34232297
181.8524.19232297
191.94736842126.13969139
202.05555555628.19524694
212.17647058830.37171753
222.312532.68421753
232.46666666735.1508842
242.64285714337.79374134
252.84615384640.63989519
263.08333333343.72322852
273.36363636447.08686488
283.750.78686488
294.11111111154.897976
304.62559.522976
315.28571428664.80869028
326.16666666770.97535695
337.478.37535695
349.2587.62535695
3512.3333333399.95869028
3618.5118.4586903
3737155.4586903

The average is not the mode (The 'mode' is the value that occurs most often)
or median (The 'median' is the 'middle' value or close to 50%)
median = spin 147 @ 0.501522154
mode = 133 @ 0.0106293156
00 Roulette (160.6602765)
# of numbersaverage # of spinscumulative sum
111
21.0270270272.027027027
31.0555555563.082582583
41.0857142864.168296868
51.1176470595.285943927
61.1515151526.437459079
71.18757.624959079
81.2258064528.85076553
91.26666666710.1174322
101.31034482811.42777702
111.35714285712.78491988
121.40740740714.19232729
131.46153846215.65386575
141.5217.17386575
151.58333333318.75719908
161.65217391320.409373
171.72727272722.13664572
181.8095238123.94616953
191.925.84616953
20227.84616953
212.11111111129.95728064
222.23529411832.19257476
232.37534.56757476
242.53333333337.1009081
252.71428571439.81519381
262.92307692342.73827073
273.16666666745.9049374
283.45454545549.35948285
293.853.15948285
304.22222222257.38170508
314.7562.13170508
325.42857142967.56027651
336.33333333373.89360984
347.681.49360984
359.590.99360984
3612.66666667103.6602765
3719122.6602765
3838160.6602765

median = spin 152 @ 0.501599171
mode = 138 @ 0.010333952
still interesting one brings up this question
Roulette HallerSally
I Heart Vi Hart

If the question is how long will it take for every number to appear in double-zero roulette, the answer is 160.6602765, on average. This is the sum of the inverse of every integer from 1 to 38.


The sum of the inverse of every integer from 1 to 38 is 4.2279020133. Using the inverse of every integer, it would take like 10^70 of them to get to 160. (160.66 is the harmonic series up to 38 times 38; using 37 for single zero roulette it is is 155)
(I learned this one when calculating the expected longest drought for a Super Bowl or World Series)
mustangsally

(160.66 is the harmonic series up to 38 times 38; using 37 for single zero roulette it is is 155)

being specific using pari/gp calculator found here
https://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/gp.html
a=sum(k=1,37,37/(37-(k-1)))
0 Roulette
00 Roulette
this is the short way to an answer
Sally
Wizard
Administrator

The sum of the inverse of every integer from 1 to 38 is 4.2279020133. Using the inverse of every integer, it would take like 10^70 of them to get to 160. (160.66 is the harmonic series up to 38 times 38; using 37 for single zero roulette it is is 155)


You're right. I forgot to say to multiply by 38.
It's not whether you win or lose; it's whether or not you had a good bet.
Thanks guys!

the OP questions 37. Where it came from
that is just 1/p where p=1/37
The average is not the mode (The 'mode' is the value that occurs most often)
or median (The 'median' is the 'middle' value or close to 50%)
median = spin 147 @ 0.501522154
mode = 133 @ 0.0106293156

Slot machines as skinner boxes. The primary difference was the video effects were then added to the gameplay. They often present mini-events after each win and during each engagement. are the most interactive online slots featuring latest 3D graphic developments.


I agree on the median. Here is my transition matrix.
0.0270.97300000000000000000000000000000000000
00.05410.94590000000000000000000000000000000000
000.08110.9189000000000000000000000000000000000
0000.10810.891900000000000000000000000000000000
00000.13510.86490000000000000000000000000000000
000000.16220.8378000000000000000000000000000000
0000000.18920.810800000000000000000000000000000
00000000.21620.78380000000000000000000000000000
000000000.24320.7568000000000000000000000000000
0000000000.27030.729700000000000000000000000000
00000000000.29730.70270000000000000000000000000
000000000000.32430.6757000000000000000000000000
0000000000000.35140.648600000000000000000000000
00000000000000.37840.62160000000000000000000000
000000000000000.40540.5946000000000000000000000
0000000000000000.43240.567600000000000000000000
00000000000000000.45950.54050000000000000000000
000000000000000000.48650.5135000000000000000000
0000000000000000000.51350.486500000000000000000
00000000000000000000.54050.45950000000000000000
000000000000000000000.56760.4324000000000000000
0000000000000000000000.59460.405400000000000000
00000000000000000000000.62160.37840000000000000
000000000000000000000000.64860.3514000000000000
0000000000000000000000000.67570.324300000000000
00000000000000000000000000.70270.29730000000000
000000000000000000000000000.72970.2703000000000
0000000000000000000000000000.75680.243200000000
00000000000000000000000000000.78380.21620000000
000000000000000000000000000000.81080.1892000000
0000000000000000000000000000000.83780.162200000
00000000000000000000000000000000.86490.13510000
000000000000000000000000000000000.89190.1081000
0000000000000000000000000000000000.91890.081100
00000000000000000000000000000000000.94590.05410
000000000000000000000000000000000000.9730.027
0000000000000000000000000000000000001

If the table is too big, cell (x,x) = x/37 and cell (x,x+1) = (37-x)/37), and every other cell is zero.
It's not whether you win or lose; it's whether or not you had a good bet.

I agree on the median. Here is my transition matrix.

to point out little differences in building a transition matrix (both are correct, one needs some special attention after calculations)
The Wizard's transition matrix (where rows sum to 1) starts with the 1st spin already completed.
I was taught to always start at 0 to make sure one does not forget to add 1 to calculations of the matrix.
(both methods are perfectly fine to use)
My TM is A, the Wizards is B (in the photo below - Wizard's values have been rounded down)
the column 1,2,3,4 is the row number and not the 'state name' for Matrix A but is correct for Matrix B
(Matrix A row names is just the row value - 1)
after raising the Wizards TM to the 146th power
(in the photo below)
we find the median (0.50141 - values have been rounded)
we must add 1 to 146 = 147 for the median (for the example 37 number Roulette)
distribution to only 160 spins
using R code section 3r.
https://sites.google.com/view/krapstuff/coupon-collecting
remember, we can only raise a square matrix to a power (as in B^146)
Enjoy
winsome johnny (not Win some johnny)
How about a math proof?

Assume there are N numbers, and K of them have already come up at least once.
This is equivalent to, 'If you have N balls, K of which are red and the other N-K are white, how many draws with replacement (i.e. when you draw a ball, you put it back) should it take before you draw a white ball?'
The probability of doing it in exactly D draws is (K / N)D-1 x (N - K) / N
= (KD-1 (N - K)) / ND
The expected number is
1 x (N - K) / N
+ 2 x K (N - K) / N2
+ 3 x K2 (N - K) / N3
+ 4 x K3 (N - K) / N4
+ ..
= (N - K) / N x (1 + 2 (K / N) + 3 (K / N)2 + 4 (K / N)3 + ..)
= (N - K) / N x (1 + (K / N) + (K / N)2 + (K / N)3 + ..)2
= (N - K) / N x (1 / (1 - (K / N))2, since K < N
= (N - K) / N x (1 / ((N - K) / N))2
= (N - K) / N x (N / (N - K))2
= (N - K) / N x N2 / (N - K)2
= N / (N - K)
At the start, K = 0; after each number is drawn for the first time, K increases by 1.
The total number is the number needed to get the first number + the number to get the
second different number once you have already drawn one + the number needed to get the
third different number once you have already drawn two different numbers + .. + the number
needed to get the Nth different number once you have already drawn N-1 different numbers
This is is N / N + N / (N-1) + N / (N-2) + .. + N / 2 + N
= N x (1 / N + 1 / (N-1) + .. + 1 / 3 + 1 / 2 + 1)
Hello,
I am new in this forum and would like to ask a question regarding European Roulette. (Single Zero Roulette)
In the Roulette Lexikon from Kurt von Haller he writes, that the last open number should show up on average after 132 spins.
Theoretically after 169 spins (132+37).
I could not find any more information on the internet about this topic. Can you confirm this numbers?
And why is it 37+132 = 169 spins? I don't understand this.
Regards
Haller
it can show up on the very next spin, right??
'Last open number' is rather ambiguous. There could be more than one sleeper for a long time and there no reason to believe that any number will become 'due' in any specific number of additional spins, merely by virtue of it achieving lone sleeper status. And frankly, if you're tracking sleepers, by the time you've eliminated other numbers to get to your one lone number, new numbers may have started sleeping, robbing that long sleeper of it's status.
At any rate..
The formula ( 36/37 ) ^ x shows the odds of a specific number NOT hitting in x spins.
When x = 132, the value is .026872 - the first time the value falls below .027027, which is the odds for any number hitting on any single spin.
Note that there is no reason to believe that a number 'should' hit at that point. I'm just guessing that the author chose to find significance there.
I have no idea what the +37 means.
Superstitions are silly, childish, irrational rituals, born out of fear of the unknown. But how much does it cost to knock on wood? 😁 Note that the same could be said for Religion. I.E. Religion is nothing more than organized superstition. 🤗
There are 37 numbered slots in single zero roulette
You add the individual integers in that number (3+7) = 10
Zero has no significance so you drop that from 10 which leaves 1
69 is the number of verbal sexuality and jts important to make verbal love with the wheel so you add that
The final result 1 added to 69 is 169
Hope that helps!
sure it can come up in the very next spin.
But the calculation from Kurt von Haller (he wrote a well known Roulette-Book) says that the average is 169.
I just would like to know if there are more sources which can confirm this Statement.

Hello,
I am new in this forum and would like to ask a question regarding European Roulette. (Single Zero Roulette)
In the Roulette Lexikon from Kurt von Haller he writes, that the last open number should show up on average after 132 spins.
Theoretically after 169 spins (132+37).

never heard of the guy. Is this a conditional probability problem? given the 37 numbers, how long on average does it take to get 36 of them?
then add 37 to that for the last number?
If that is what the secret is
Quote: masterj

I could not find any more information on the internet about this topic. Can you confirm this numbers?
And why is it 37+132 = 169 spins? I don't understand this.

169 is then not right.
118.4586903 is the average number of spins to get 36 of the 37 numbers
add 37 to that 155.4586903
that is what I get calculating getting all 37 numbers starting at 0

Roulette Challenges


> N.mean(37)
[1] 155.4587
'last open number' could have different meanings to different people
Sally

never heard of the guy. Is this a conditional probability problem? given the 37 numbers, how long on average does it take to get 36 of them?
then add 37 to that for the last number?
If that is what the secret is
169 is then not right.
118.4586903 is the average number of spins to get 36 of the 37 numbers
add 37 to that 155.4586903
that is what I get calculating getting all 37 numbers starting at 0
> an(37)
[1] 155.4587
'last open number' could have different meanings to different people
Sally


for me 'last open number' means if for example after 120 spins we got 36 out of 37 numbers, then on average how many spins we have to wait for the last one to show up?
I know we can get this last number in the next spin, and it can't show up for the next x spins.michael99000
Thanks for this post from:

never heard of the guy. Is this a conditional probability problem? given the 37 numbers, how long on average does it take to get 36 of them?
then add 37 to that for the last number?
If that is what the secret is
169 is then not right.
118.4586903 is the average number of spins to get 36 of the 37 numbers
add 37 to that 155.4586903
that is what I get calculating getting all 37 numbers starting at 0
> an(37)
[1] 155.4587
'last open number' could have different meanings to different people
Sally


Roulette Half Wheel Strategy

for me 'last open number' means if for example after 120 spins we got 36 out of 37 numbers, then on average how many spins we have to wait for the last one to show up?
I know we can get this last number in the next spin, and it can't show up for the next x spins.
The number of spins it would take on average to get that number from that point on, is exactly the same as if it wasn’t the last number standing.
EvenBob
Haller

) says that the average is 169.


So what. Even if true, how would this
benefit you in any way. The number
could sleep for 400 spins and show

Kurt Von Haller Roulette Lexikon Online

up 3 times in a row.
'It's not enough to succeed, your friends must fail.' Gore Vidal
michael99000

Kurt Von Haller Roulette Lexikon 2016

sure it can come up in the very next spin.
But the calculation from Kurt von Haller (he wrote a well known Roulette-Book) says that the average is 169.
I just would like to know if there are more sources which can confirm this Statement.


I bet Kurt Von Haller made more money selling his book than he did playing roulette

Kurt Von Haller Roulette Lexikon Free

Roulette haller model
  • Page 1 of 4
Comments are closed.